linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] mm: do not drop unused pages when userfaultd is running

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Jun 2018 23:46:05 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] mm: do not drop unused pages when userfaultd is
 running

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 08:51:23AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/28/2018 02:39 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > KVM guests on s390 can notify the host of unused pages. This can result
> > in pte_unused callbacks to be true for KVM guest memory.
> > 
> > If a page is unused (checked with pte_unused) we might drop this page
> > instead of paging it. This can have side-effects on userfaultd, when the
> > page in question was already migrated:
> > 
> > The next access of that page will trigger a fault and a user fault
> > instead of faulting in a new and empty zero page. As QEMU does not
> > expect a userfault on an already migrated page this migration will fail.
> > 
> > The most straightforward solution is to ignore the pte_unused hint if a
> > userfault context is active for this VMA.
> > 
> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> > Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/rmap.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > index 6db729dc4c50..3f3a72aa99f2 100644
> > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > @@ -1481,7 +1481,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >  				set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
> >  			}
> >  
> > -		} else if (pte_unused(pteval)) {
> > +		} else if (pte_unused(pteval) && !vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx) {
> 
> FWIW, this needs a fix for !CONFIG_USERFAULTFD.

There's userfaultfd_armed() in include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h. Just
s/!vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx/!userfaultfd_armed(vma)

> Still: more opinions on the patch itself? 

If the only use case for pte_unused() hint is guest notification for host,
the patch seems Ok to me.

> >  			/*
> >  			 * The guest indicated that the page content is of no
> >  			 * interest anymore. Simply discard the pte, vmscan
> > 
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.