linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 033/101] of: unittest: for strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun,  1 Jul 2018 18:21:19 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@...co.com>,
        Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 033/101] of: unittest: for strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@...co.com>

commit 3b9cf7905fe3ab35ab437b5072c883e609d3498d upstream.

For strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field:

This is consistent with how dtc builds string properties.

Function __of_prop_dup() would misbehave on such properties as it duplicates
properties based on the property length field creating new string values
without trailing \0s.

Signed-off-by: Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@...co.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
Tested-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/of/unittest.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -155,20 +155,20 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(v
 	/* Add a new property - should pass*/
 	prop->name = "new-property";
 	prop->value = "new-property-data";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) == 0, "Adding a new property failed\n");
 
 	/* Try to add an existing property - should fail */
 	prop++;
 	prop->name = "new-property";
 	prop->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) != 0,
 		 "Adding an existing property should have failed\n");
 
 	/* Try to modify an existing property - should pass */
 	prop->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
 		 "Updating an existing property should have passed\n");
 
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(v
 	prop++;
 	prop->name = "modify-property";
 	prop->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
 		 "Updating a missing property should have passed\n");