lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:19:19 +0800
From:   "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 00/21] mm, THP, swap: Swapout/swapin THP in one piece

Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:17:16AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> writes:
>> > I'll take a look.  Honestly, my biggest problem with this patch set is
>> > overuse of tagging:
>> >
>> > 59832     Jun 22 Huang, Ying     ( 131) [PATCH -mm -v4 00/21] mm, THP, swap: Swa
>> > There's literally zero useful information displayed in the patch subjects.
>> 
>> Thanks!  What's your suggestion on tagging?  Only keep "mm" or "swap"?
>
> Subject: [PATCH v14 10/74] xarray: Add XArray tags
>
> I'm not sure where the extra '-' in front of '-v4' comes from.  I also
> wouldn't put the '-mm' in front of it -- that information can live in
> the cover letter's body rather than any patch's subject.
>
> I think 'swap:' implies "mm:", so yeah I'd just go with that.
>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 00/21] swap: Useful information here
>
> I'd see that as:
>
> 59832     Jun 22 Huang, Ying     ( 131) [PATCH v4 00/21] swap: Useful informatio

Looks good!  I will use this naming convention in the future.

> I had a quick look at your patches.  I think only two are affected by
> the XArray, and I'll make some general comments about them soon.

Thanks!

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ