linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:38:24 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the
 reset framework

Hi Bjorn,

On Thursday 21 June 2018 05:11 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2018-06-21 12:52 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>:
>> Hi Bartosz,
>>
>> On Thursday 21 June 2018 01:07 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>>
>>> These are the remaining patches that still need to be merged in order
>>> to complete the conversion of the davinci dsp driver to using the reset
>>> framework.
>>>
>>> They apply on top of v4.18-rc1 with David Lechner's remaining patches
>>> merged.
>>
>> Series looks good to me.
>>
>> To preserve bisect, shouldn't the order of applying be patch #3, #4, #1
>> and #2 ?
>>
>> Given the dependencies and to preserve bisect its easiest if I take the
>> series with acks from remoteproc and clock maintainers.
>>
>> Open to other suggestions as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sekhar
> 
> Oops you're right about the order. Do you want me to resend?

With your ack, I can queue 1/4 for v4.19 and provide an immutable commit
to you (on top of v4.18-rc1) for you to merge any further changes you
want to queue from your tree.

Bartosz, given the number of moving pieces, I think its better to keep
2/4 for v4.20 release - once all other other dependencies have been merged.

Thanks,
Sekhar