linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] mfd/regulator/clk/input: bd71837: ROHM BD71837 PMIC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Jul 2018 11:47:15 +0300
From:   Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
        mazziesaccount@...il.com, arnd@...db.de, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
        sre@...nel.org, chenjh@...k-chips.com, andrew.smirnov@...il.com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, kstewart@...uxfoundation.org,
        heiko@...ech.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        mikko.mutanen@...rohmeurope.com, heikki.haikola@...rohmeurope.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] mfd/regulator/clk/input: bd71837: ROHM BD71837
 PMIC driver

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:02:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 01:55:31PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > Patch series adding support for ROHM BD71837 PMIC.
> > > 
> > What is the preferred way when I send updated patches:
> > 
> > 1. always resend _all_ unapplied patches even if there is no changes to
> >    some of them. (patch-vN mail thread contains _all_ unapplied patches)
> > 2. only resend changed patches (patch-vN mail thread contains only
> >    patches that were changed from patch-vN-1)
> > 
> > I have currently used approach 1 - so that no patches would be
> > accidentally forgotten - but downside is that people need to check if
> > they have already reviewed some of the patches. I'd rather not caused
> > any extra work. What is the most convenient way for you guys?
> 
> Option 1 is preferred.
> 
> Just ensure you apply any tags you have collected so reviewers can see
> which patches are pending a review.  It's also a good idea to keep a
> succinct change log between the "--" marker and the diff stat where
> you can state "v4: No change" or the like.

Right. Thanks. Just one question - what if I get reviewed-by for a
patch which I later rework? Like this MFD patch where I got reviewed-by
from Linus Walleij for v6 - but which I reworked due to comments from
Enric and Dmitry. I have not kept the reviewed-by as the patch is not
exactly the same Linus was originally reviewing. I guess the tags should
be only kept for patches which are unchanged, right?
> 
> -- 
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
> Linaro Services Technical Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog