lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:44:20 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] device core: Add flag to autoremove device link on supplier unbind

On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 9:16:20 AM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Adding Ulf and Marek.
> 
> On 6/27/2018 6:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > Add a flag to autoremove the device links on supplier driver
> > unbind. This obviates the need to explicitly delete the link
> > in the remove path.
> > We remove these links only when the supplier's link to its
> > consumers has gone to DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND state.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
> > Suggested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> > Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> 
> Hi Rafael, et al.
> 
> Gentle ping.
> Do you have comments on this series. I would really like to conclude these
> device link additions sooner, and get things moving on the long awaited
> arm-smmu clock/runtime support series.
> 
> Thanks again for reviewing these patches.

They are fine by me.

I can queue them up for 4.19 if no one has objections (Greg in
particular).

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ