linux-kernel - [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Jul 2018 09:18:33 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
        Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit

Add suffix ULL to constant 64 in order to give the compiler complete
information about the proper arithmetic to use.

Notice that such constant is used in a context that expects an
expression of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned) and the following
expression is currently being evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic:

rate[index] * txclk_df * 64

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1222129 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
index 9b59d87..740b90d 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c
@@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ static u32 fsl_spdif_txclk_caldiv(struct fsl_spdif_priv *spdif_priv,
 
 	for (sysclk_df = sysclk_dfmin; sysclk_df <= sysclk_dfmax; sysclk_df++) {
 		for (txclk_df = 1; txclk_df <= 128; txclk_df++) {
-			rate_ideal = rate[index] * txclk_df * 64;
+			rate_ideal = rate[index] * txclk_df * 64ULL;
 			if (round)
 				rate_actual = clk_round_rate(clk, rate_ideal);
 			else
-- 
2.7.4