linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Jul 2018 19:15:07 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Xiongfeng Wang <xiongfeng.wang@...aro.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Nikolaus Voss
<nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de> wrote:
> struct i2c_device_id argument of probe() is not used, so use probe_new()
> instead.
>

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>

After Javier's explanations it's more clear now why we leave i2c ID table.

> Signed-off-by: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_i2c.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_i2c.c
> index c6e08c834f11..0659e9a67f85 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_i2c.c
> @@ -138,8 +138,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id st_accel_id_table[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, st_accel_id_table);
>
> -static int st_accel_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> -                                               const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +static int st_accel_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
>         struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>         struct st_sensor_data *adata;
> @@ -179,7 +178,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver st_accel_driver = {
>                 .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(st_accel_of_match),
>                 .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(st_accel_acpi_match),
>         },
> -       .probe = st_accel_i2c_probe,
> +       .probe_new = st_accel_i2c_probe,
>         .remove = st_accel_i2c_remove,
>         .id_table = st_accel_id_table,
>  };
> --
> 2.17.1
>



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko