linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] RISC-V: Add definiion of extract symbol's index and type for 32-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 05 Jul 2018 09:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
To:     zongbox@...il.com
CC:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, zong@...estech.com,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        greentime@...estech.com
Subject:     Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] RISC-V: Add definiion of extract symbol's index and type for 32-bit

On Thu, 05 Jul 2018 06:33:07 PDT (-0700), zongbox@...il.com wrote:
> Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com> 於 2018年7月5日 週四 上午4:58寫道：
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:53:49 PDT (-0700), zongbox@...il.com wrote:
>> > Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> 於 2018年6月29日 週五 下午3:12寫道：
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 04:49:39PM +0800, Zong Li wrote:
>> >> > Use generic marco to get the index and type of symbol.
>> >>
>> >> Why do we even need this in a uapi header?  Shouldn't ELF_RISCV_R_SYM
>> >> and ELF_RISCV_R_TYPE move to module.c?  In that case we could just
>> >> use CONFIG_64BIT.
>> >
>> > Make sense. I even think the all definitions can be move to include/asm/elf.h.
>> > How do you think about that?
>>
>> Sorry I've been slow about reviewing this, but I think just in the interest of
>> getting a sane RV32I port up and running quickly (so we can try to get glibc in
>> shape) I'm going to take this for now.
>>
>> Do you mind submitting a cleanup patch?
>
> I will send a patch to clean up. Thanks everyone to review this patchset.

Well, thanks for doing the work :).