lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 6 Jul 2018 03:59:23 +0000
From:   KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:     "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
        "olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
        "apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
        "jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
        "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] X86/Hyper-V:: Fix the circular dependency in IPI
 enlightenment.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 3:46 PM
> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; x86@...nel.org;
> gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; olaf@...fle.de; apw@...onical.com;
> jasowang@...hat.com; hpa@...or.com; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>; Michael Kelley (EOSG)
> <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>; vkuznets@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] X86/Hyper-V:: Fix the circular dependency in IPI
> enlightenment.
> 
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> > > I am confused. The label ipi_mask_done was introduced in this patch
> > > (the patch under question fixes a circular dependency in this patch):
> > >
> > > commit 68bb7bfb7985df2bd15c2dc975cb68b7a901488a
> > > Author: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> > > Date:   Wed May 16 14:53:31 2018 -0700
> > >
> > >     X86/Hyper-V: Enable IPI enlightenments
> > >
> > >     Hyper-V supports hypercalls to implement IPI; use them.
> > >
> > >     Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> > >     Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > >     Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
> > >
> > > This patch was committed by Thomas some weeks ago and is in linux-
> next.
> > > This patch is also in 4.18-rc3.
> >
> > And then that name was changed to a different label in:
> >
> >   4bd06060762b: x86/hyper-v: Use cheaper HVCALL_SEND_IPI hypercall
> when possible
> >
> > So maybe you were testing on an older kernel. Could you try the latest -
> tip?


> 
> The problem is that the wreckage is in Linus tree and needs to be fixed
> there, i.e. via x86/urgent.
> 
> Now we have the new bits queued in x86/hyperv already which collide. So
> we
> need to merge x86/urgent into x86/hyperv after applying the fix and mop up
> the merge wreckage in x86/hyperv.
> 
> I'll have a look tomorrow morning unless you beat me to it.

I can rebase this patch against the latest tip and resend (tomorrow).

K. Y 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ