[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 03:08:48 +1000
From: Simon Shields <simon@...eageos.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: exynos: add max77693 irq configuration for
midas
On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 05:34:08PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 7 July 2018 at 16:45, Simon Shields <simon@...eageos.org> wrote:
> > Currently, we assume that the bootloader has correctly configured
> > the interrupt pin for max77693. This might not actually be the case -
> > so it's better to configure it explicitly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Shields <simon@...eageos.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-midas.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-midas.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-midas.dtsi
> > index f35176a35a15..30760bf2eb71 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-midas.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-midas.dtsi
> > @@ -156,6 +156,8 @@
> > compatible = "maxim,max77693";
> > interrupt-parent = <&gpx1>;
> > interrupts = <5 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&max77693_irq>;
> > reg = <0x66>;
> >
> > regulators {
> > @@ -1117,6 +1119,13 @@
> > samsung,pin-pud = <EXYNOS_PIN_PULL_DOWN>;
> > };
> >
> > + max77693_irq: max77693-irq {
> > + samsung,pins = "gpx1-5";
> > + samsung,pin-function = <EXYNOS_PIN_FUNC_INPUT>;
> > + samsung,pin-pud = <EXYNOS_PIN_PULL_NONE>;
> > + samsung,pin-drv = <EXYNOS4_PIN_DRV_LV1>;
> > + };
> > +
>
> Please put it before hdmi-hpd (gpx3-7).
OK.
> What about the interrupt for max77693 fuel gauge?
> Maybe another patch for it as well?
Yes - in fact, it looks like most interrupt pins are configured by the
vendor kernel to have PULL_NONE, something which (as far as i can tell)
mainline doesn't do.
Maybe I should just prepare a series (or a single patch) which fixes all of them?
Or would you prefer I added the (remaining) eint configurations to
exynos4412-pinctrl.dtsi, and then used those?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Cheers,
Simon
>
> > sleep1: sleep-states {
> > PIN_SLP(gpk0-0, PREV, NONE);
> > PIN_SLP(gpk0-1, PREV, NONE);
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists