linux-kernel - Re: cgroup trace events acquire sleeping locks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:32:45 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        tglx@...utronix.de, Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cgroup trace events acquire sleeping locks

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:26:35 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> > Hmm, good question. I could possibly make all the tracepoint code into
> > its own section. And then look to see if any spin locks exist in them.
> > That wouldn't be too trivial to implement though.  
> 
> pick a bit from the preempt_count (say right above NMI_MASK) and set it
> inside a trace-event and add in_trace().
> 
> Then make lockdep explode when in_trace().
> 
> Or something along those lines.

Sure. We have current->trace for special tracing flags. That could
easily be used.

-- Steve