linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3] watchdog: sp805: Add clock-frequency property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:30:16 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>,
        wim@...ux-watchdog.org, Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
        Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@...adcom.com>,
        Vikram Prakash <vikram.prakash@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] watchdog: sp805: Add clock-frequency property

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:47:49AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/11/2018 06:22 AM, Srinath Mannam wrote:
> >Hi Guenter,
> >
> >Thank you very much for all the help with your feedback and review
> >comments to complete the changes very fast.
> >
> >About the documentation..
> >I have gone through few similar patches available in the kernel are
> >listed in the mail of previous version.
> >No documentation available in Linux for the properties used in those
> >patches also.
>
> " No documentation available _in Linux_"
>
> Emphasis mine. Yes, I noticed this as well. I was asking for a reference
> to documentation _outside_ Linux. Sorry for not being more specific.

Typically new properties needs to registered or discussed in dsd@...ica.org
Though there's almost no activity on that list for more than a year now.
IIRC, the thread[1] gives kind of agreement that was reached after
elaborate discussion on _DSD properties.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lists.acpica.org/pipermail/dsd/2015-December/000027.html