linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ubifs: use timespec64 for inode timestamps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Jul 2018 16:30:01 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
        Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Hyunchul Lee <cheol.lee@....com>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: use timespec64 for inode timestamps

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 4:20 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2018, 10:12:58 CEST schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
>> Both vfs and the on-disk inode structures can deal with fine-grained
>> timestamps now, so this is the last missing piece to make ubifs
>> y2038-safe on 32-bit architectures.
>
> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>
> Shall this patch go through the ubifs tree?

Sorry I missed the question earlier. Yes, it would be nice if you could pick
it up there. I'm resending both patches now for your convenience.

       Arnd