lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 14 Jul 2018 14:32:12 +0200
From:   Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
To:     Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] drm: re-enable error handling

drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next() returns idr_alloc() which can return
-ENOMEM, -EINVAL or -ENOSPC none of which are -1 . but the call sites 
of drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next() seem to be assuming that the error case
would be -1 (original return of drm_ctxbitmap_next() prior to 2.6.23
was actually -1). Thus reenable error handling by checking for < 0.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Fixes: 62968144e673 ("drm: convert drm context code to use Linux idr")
---

Problem located with experimental coccinelle script

The noted Fixes tag is one of the commits that removed the -1 return
value in 2.6.23 in drm_ctxbitmap_next() but thats not the only change
that must have taken place to invalidate the error check.

Patch was compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig

Patch is against 4.18-rc4 (localversion-next is next-20180713)

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c
index 3c4000f..f973d28 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ int drm_legacy_addctx(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 		ctx->handle = drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_next(dev);
 	}
 	DRM_DEBUG("%d\n", ctx->handle);
-	if (ctx->handle == -1) {
+	if (ctx->handle < 0) {
 		DRM_DEBUG("Not enough free contexts.\n");
 		/* Should this return -EBUSY instead? */
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.1.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ