linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 08/18] net: davinci_emac: potentially get the MAC address from MTD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:56:46 +0100
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/18] net: davinci_emac: potentially get the MAC
 address from MTD



On 16/07/18 09:50, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Friday 13 July 2018 11:30 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 
>> We're getting close to rc5 so I'd like to make a case for this series again.
>>
>> I understand that there's more to do than just the changes introduced
>> here, but we shouldn't try to fix several problems in many different
>> places at once. There's just too many moving pieces. I'd rather start
>> merging small improvements right away.
>>
>> The idea behind this series is to remove (almost) all users of
>> at24_platform_data. The davinci_emac patches are there only because we
>> need to remove some MAC adress reading stuff from the board files.
>> Having this code there and calling it back from EEPROM/MTD drivers is
>> already wrong and we should work towards using nvmem for that anyway.
>>
>> Currently for MTD the nvmem support series seems to be dead and it's
>> going to take some time before anything gets upstream.
>>
>> So I'd like to again ask you to consider picking up the patches from
>> this series to your respective trees or at the very least: I'd like to
>> ask Srinivas to pick up the nvmem patches and Sekhar to take the
>> first, non-controversial batch of davinci platform changes so that
>> we'll have less code to carry for the next release.
> 
> I think those are patches 3-7. I can take those if I get an immutable
> commit over v4.18-rc1 from Srinivas with patches 1 & 2 applied.
nvmem patches go via Greg KH char-misc tree, if it makes things easy I 
can provide Ack on nvmem patches, so that you can take these patches via 
your tree?

Let me know.

--srini
> 
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>