lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:54:16 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>
Cc:     hdegoede@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, mark.rutland@....com,
        maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, tj@...nel.org, wens@...e.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        icenowy@...c.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] dt-bindings: ata: ahci-platform: document AHCI
 reset

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:03:01AM +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> This patch document the new optional resets for ahci node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt
> index 5f362af2724c..a5281d7557e3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ Optional properties:
>  - phys              : reference to the SATA PHY node
>  - phy-names         : must be "sata-phy"
>  - ahci-supply       : regulator for AHCI controller
> +- resets            : phandle to the reset line of AHCI controller
> +                      If set, must have a reset-names set as "ahci"

A name is pointless if there is only one. Also, the name should be what 
the signal in the block is called which I doubt would be called "ahci". 
A likely name is some form of reset, resetn, etc. which again is 
pointless to name if there is only 1.

If you do have 'reset-names' then that needs to be listed too like 
phy-names.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ