linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] docs/mm: add boot time memory management docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:02:49 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] docs/mm: add boot time memory management docs

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:47:30 +0300
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > So this seems like good stuff overall.  It digs pretty deeply into the mm
> > code, though, so I'm a little reluctant to apply it without an ack from an
> > mm developer.  Alternatively, I'm happy to step back if Andrew wants to
> > pick the set up.  
> 
> Jon, does Michal's reply [1] address your concerns?
> Or should I respin and ask Andrew to pick it up? 
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180712080006.GA328@dhcp22.suse.cz/

Michal acked #11 (the docs patch) in particular but not the series as a
whole.  But it's the rest of the series that I was most worried about :)
I'm happy for the patches to take either path, but I'd really like an
explicit ack before I apply that many changes directly to the MM code...

Thanks,

jon