linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth:hci_bcm:Check return value from devm_clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:09:55 +0200
From:   Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:     RAGHU Halharvi <raghuhack78@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth:hci_bcm:Check return value from devm_clk_get

Hi Raghu,

> * Check return value from devm_clk_get & return appropriate error.
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
> index 441f5e1deb11..1295cc89d702 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
> @@ -910,6 +910,8 @@ static int bcm_get_resources(struct bcm_device *dev)
> 		return 0;
> 
> 	dev->clk = devm_clk_get(dev->dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(dev->clk))
> +		return PTR_ERR(dev->clk);

so I assumed this was not done on purpose and allow for dev->clk = NULL since all other clock handling functions will cope with it. Can someone NAK or ACK this patch?

Regards

Marcel