linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: dts: exynos5: add missing interrupts for pwm node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:18:45 +0530
From:   Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: dts: exynos5: add missing interrupts for pwm node

Hi Krzysztof,

On 18 July 2018 at 19:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 18 July 2018 at 14:59, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com> wrote:
>> Add missing GIC interrupts property for pwm nodes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Fixed the patch indentation issue with all tabs.
>> sorry checkpatch could not figure out the error.
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>> index 5d2f0a0..f48fb9b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>> @@ -169,6 +169,11 @@
>>                 pwm: pwm@...d0000 {
>>                         compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
>>                         reg = <0x12DD0000 0x100>;
>> +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +                                       <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +                                       <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +                                       <GIC_SPI 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +                                       <GIC_SPI 40 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>
> OK, thanks for v2. Now only tabs are used but in previous mail I
> mentioned which example to use - the rtc node which nicely aligns
> continued lines. Why you did not follow this alignment?
>
> I'll fix it when applying, no need to resend.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Thanks, I follow the tab protocol otherwise checkpatch would have
complained of tab/space issue.

Best Regards
-Anand