lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:53:48 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] call_with_creds()

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:46 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Huh?  Nevermind ->write(), what about open()?

What about open?

At open time, file->f_cred is the same as current_cred().

So yes, open uses current cred. What's the problem?

Now, if you then use a tasklet or some other thread to do the open,
then obviously that is no longer true. But then the problem is that
you're doing the open() itself in the wrong context, and that has
nothing to do with any general issue, and everything to do with "you
changed to another context without pulling all the context data with
you - you're buggy". Doing some kind of "call_with_creds()" isn't the
solultion - it's just part of the whole thing (what about user
accounting etc? If you switch to another thread to do the work, you
have way more issues than just creds).

              Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ