linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: w1: document generic onewire bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:01:05 +0200
From:   Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>, zbr@...emap.net,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, szabolcs.gyurko@....hu,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: w1: document generic onewire bindings

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 09:10:36AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 6:40 AM Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, July 11, 2018 05:01 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 07:35:48AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > >> This patch adds a generic w1 bindings document that describes how w1
> > >> slave deviceses are grouped under master nodes. It also augments the
> > >> existing w1-gpio.txt document a bit.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
> > >> ---
> > >>   .../devicetree/bindings/w1/w1-gpio.txt        | 11 +++++---
> > >>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/w1/w1.txt   | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >>   2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/w1/w1.txt
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > Note that this will conflict with a unit-address fix that I have queued
> > > up for 4.18 (will send this week).
> >
> > How would we best handle this? Sebastian, are you going to apply this
> > series, and add a note to the PR for 4.19 on how to resolve the conflict?
> 
> Either 4.18-rc6 or my devicetree-fixes-for-4.18 tag (based on rc1) can
> be pulled in. Or just note the conflict. It is trivial enough.

This looks simple enough to just add a note to my pull request. I
prepared a immutable branch based on 4.18-rc1, which contains this
series and merged it into the power supply subsystem. You can get
it here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-power-supply.git/tag/?h=ds2760-for-v4.19-signed

-- Sebastian

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)