lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:11:11 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Minas Harutyunyan <hminas@...opsys.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Bruno Herrera <bruherrera@...il.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 0/4] usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe sched everywhere

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:59 AM, Felipe Balbi
<felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> writes:
>
>> While looking at a dwc2 recently, I noticed that some platforms still
>> have the uframe scheduler off.  As far as I know, nothing good can
>> come out of having the uframe scheduler off.  Let's turn it on
>> everywhere.  Assuming this all works out then some time in the future
>> we can gut all the old code that handles the old non-uframe scheduler
>> and make everything simpler.
>>
>> NOTE: I don't have access to any of the platforms that I'm changing
>> here, so I'm hoping to see a Tested-by from those on the list.
>>
>>
>> Douglas Anderson (4):
>>   usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe_sched on "bcm" platforms
>>   usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe_sched on "his" platforms
>>   usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe_sched on "amlogic" platforms
>>   usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe_sched on "stm32f4x9_fsotg" platforms
>
> care to resend without RFT prefix and with collected acks, tested-bys, etc?

Done with a prefix of 'REPOST' to hopefully make it obvious nothing
changed between the RFT and this version.  There were only two
test-by, but as mentioned in the updated cover letter:

Since there should be nothing platform specific about the uFrame
scheduler presumably this should mean we're good to go?  Specificaly
note that in at least one of the "Tested-by" reports this patch caused
a notable improvement.


BTW: I'm pleased to have you apply the patches, but I notice that
get_maintainer no longer flags you as the person to post dwc2 patches
to.  From linux-next:

$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/usb/dwc2
Minas Harutyunyan <hminas@...opsys.com> (maintainer:DESIGNWARE USB2
DRD IP DRIVER)
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> (supporter:USB SUBSYSTEM)
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org (open list:DESIGNWARE USB2 DRD IP DRIVER)
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)


-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ