linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] docs/mm: add boot time memory management docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 15:45:57 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] docs/mm: add boot time memory management docs

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:00:43 +0300
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > Michal acked #11 (the docs patch) in particular but not the series as a
> > whole.  But it's the rest of the series that I was most worried about :)
> > I'm happy for the patches to take either path, but I'd really like an
> > explicit ack before I apply that many changes directly to the MM code...  
> 
> Andrew,
> 
> Can you please take a look at this series? The thread starts at [1] and if
> it'd be more convenient to you I can respin the whole set.

It seems this hasn't happened - at least, I don't see the patches in
linux-next.  Unless somebody says something I think I'll just go ahead and
merge the set.  It all still applies cleanly enough, no conflicts against
-next, and I'd hate to see this work fall through the cracks.

jon