lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:30:08 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at
 should_reclaim_retry().

On 2018/07/31 20:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> I will send the patch to Andrew if the patch is ok. 
>>
>> Andrew, can we send the "we used to have a sleeping point in the oom path but this has
>> been removed recently" patch to linux.git ?
> 
> This can really wait for the next merge window IMHO.
> 

"mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer" in linux-next.git is reviving that sleeping point.
Current "mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer" will not be sent to linux.git in the next
merge window? I'm confused...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ