linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: readd gpio-ranges properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:11:23 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, thierry.reding@...il.com
Cc:     jonathanh@...dia.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        pdeschrijver@...dia.co, marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: readd gpio-ranges properties

On Thursday, 2 August 2018 01:51:42 MSK Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 01.08.2018 22:51, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > On Thursday, 26 July 2018 18:40:25 MSK Stefan Agner wrote:
> >> The properties have been commented out to prevent a regression a
> >> while ago. The first regression should be resolved by
> >> commit 44af7927316e ("spi: Map SPI OF client IRQ at probe time").
> >> 
> >> The second regression is probably addressed by
> >> commit 494fd7b7ad10 ("PM / core: fix deferred probe breaking suspend
> >> resume
> >> order") and/or maybe others. Readd the gpio-ranges properties to see
> >> whether regressions still get reported.
> >> 
> >> This reverts commit 4f1d841475e1f6e9e32496dda11215db56f4ea73
> >> ("ARM: tegra: Comment out gpio-ranges properties").
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Unfortunately the second regression hasn't been addressed yet, this patch
> > still breaks wake-up using GPIO key. BTW, better to spell "readd" as
> > "re-add".
> You do have the hardware and could test it?

Yes, I have.

> Hm, that is unfortunate. I think this was the patch which should address
> the issue:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/10/218

I've tested the patch and it is still actual, i.e. it fixes the wake-up.
Welcome back to 2015 :-)