linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/hw_breakpoint: Modify breakpoint even if the new attr has disabled set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Aug 2018 15:49:47 +0200
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Milind Chabbi <chabbi.milind@...il.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/hw_breakpoint: Modify breakpoint even if the
 new attr has disabled set

On 08/06, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:07:31PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 08/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > But, with or without this fix, shouldn't we set .disabled = 1 if modify_() fails?
> > > IIUC this doesn't matter, bp->attr.disabled is not really used anyway, but looks a
> > > bit confusing.
> >
> > I am looking at another caller perf_event_modify_breakpoint(). It too doesn't set
> > attr.disabled = 1 on failure, it does _perf_event_enable() instead so attr.disabled
> > should be correct.
> >
> > But this looks wrong. If modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check() paths fails after
> > arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() was called, then we can not simply restore
>
> hum, arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings was removed recently.. r u checking the last sources?

I do not see this change in Linus's tree...


Nevermind, if this was already changed/fixed somewhere, please forget.

Oleg.