linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix unwind errors from PEBS entries (mk-II)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Aug 2018 17:42:35 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Fubo Chen <fubo.chen@...il.com>
Cc:     jpoimboe@...hat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix unwind errors from PEBS entries
 (mk-II)

On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 08:35:07AM -0700, Fubo Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:21 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> > @@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ enum perf_event_sample_format {
> >         PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR                   = 1U << 19,
> >
> >         PERF_SAMPLE_MAX = 1U << 20,             /* non-ABI */
> > +
> > +       __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY           = 1UL << 63,
> >  };
> 
> The above change makes sparse unhappy :-( Sparse reports the following
> complaint about __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY:

I thought I changed that to 1ULL before commit.