linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Aug 2018 00:55:06 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator
 bindings

On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:55:53PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org> wrote:

> > The arm-soc guys merged the Qualcomm pull requests.  So you can just use my
> > qcom-drivers-for-4.19 tag.  That won't change at this point.

> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agross/linux.git
> > qcom-drivers-for-4.19

> Did Andy's idea of using the above tag work for you?  It appears that
> there are a few patches you don't need there, but it shouldn't hurt to
> pick them up too I think?  Here's what I see:

It does make my pull request look larger which is hard to get enthused
about.

> a3134fb09e0b drivers: soc: Add LLCC driver

Stuff like this jumped out for example.

> It seems like it's too late to land RPMh-regulator for 4.19, so I
> guess we'll have to aim for 4.20.  I'm not sure if that means you're
> going to want to wait until 4.20-rc1 comes out to use as a base before
> thinking about landing RPMh-regulator?  If so then I guess we've got

If I apply it after the merge window it's going to be based on -rc1.  If
I get to it this week I guess I'll have to pull in the drivers tag.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)