[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:59:57 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: alternative: Use true and false for boolean values
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value. This code was detected with the help of
Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
index 36fb069..b5d6039 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -47,11 +47,11 @@ static bool branch_insn_requires_update(struct alt_instr *alt, unsigned long pc)
unsigned long replptr;
if (kernel_text_address(pc))
- return 1;
+ return true;
replptr = (unsigned long)ALT_REPL_PTR(alt);
if (pc >= replptr && pc <= (replptr + alt->alt_len))
- return 0;
+ return false;
/*
* Branching into *another* alternate sequence is doomed, and
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists