[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 11:12:24 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
darrick.wong@...cle.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
hughd@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, aspriel@...il.com,
vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org, robin.murphy@....com, joe@...ches.com,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
mhocko@...e.com, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com,
willy@...radead.org, ying.huang@...el.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
jbacik@...com, mingo@...nel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/10] Introduce lockless shrink_slab()
Hi Kirill,
On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 18:37:19 +0300 Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
>
> After bitmaps of not-empty memcg shrinkers were implemented
> (see "[PATCH v9 00/17] Improve shrink_slab() scalability..."
> series, which is already in mm tree), all the evil in perf
> trace has moved from shrink_slab() to down_read_trylock().
> As reported by Shakeel Butt:
>
> > I created 255 memcgs, 255 ext4 mounts and made each memcg create a
> > file containing few KiBs on corresponding mount. Then in a separate
> > memcg of 200 MiB limit ran a fork-bomb.
> >
> > I ran the "perf record -ag -- sleep 60" and below are the results:
> > + 47.49% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] down_read_trylock
> > + 30.72% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] up_read
> > + 9.51% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mem_cgroup_iter
> > + 1.69% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] shrink_node_memcg
> > + 1.35% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mem_cgroup_protected
> > + 1.05% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath
> > + 0.85% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock
> > + 0.78% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lruvec_lru_size
> > + 0.57% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] shrink_node
> > + 0.54% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] queue_work_on
> > + 0.46% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] shrink_slab_memcg
>
> The patchset continues to improve shrink_slab() scalability and makes
> it lockless completely. Here are several steps for that:
So do you have any numbers for after theses changes?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists