[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:53:28 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: mpe@...erman.id.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf report: Add raw report support for s390
auxiliary trace
Em Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:39:58AM +0200, Thomas-Mich Richter escreveu:
> On 08/08/2018 05:37 AM, mpe@...erman.id.au wrote:
> > Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
> >> Add support for s390 auxiliary trace support.
> >> Use 'perf record -e rbd000' to create the perf.data file.
> >> The event also has the symbolic name SF_CYCLES_BASIC_DIAG,
> >> using 'perf record -e SF_CYCLES_BASIC_DIAG' is equivalent.
> > ...
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> tools/perf/util/s390-cpumsf-kernel.h | 71 ++++++++
> >> tools/perf/util/s390-cpumsf.c | 244 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> 2 files changed, 314 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/s390-cpumsf-kernel.h
> >
> >
> > I'm seeing a build break on ppc64le which seems to be caused by this
> > commit (I haven't bisected):
> >
> > util/s390-cpumsf.c: In function ‘trailer_timestamp’:
> > util/s390-cpumsf.c:222:2: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
> > return *((unsigned long long *) &te->timestamp[te->t]);
> > ^
> >
> >
> > And on powerpc big endian:
> > In file included from util/cpumap.h:10:0,
> > from util/s390-cpumsf.c:150:
> > util/s390-cpumsf.c: In function ‘s390_cpumsf_basic_show’:
> > util/s390-cpumsf.c:187:10: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘size_t {aka unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
> > pr_err("Invalid AUX trace basic entry [%#08lx]\n", pos);
> > ^
> >
> > cheers
> >
>
> Can you please try this patch. Thanks a lot
Ok, this was making the build fail as well on some containers here:
1 37.95 alpine:3.4 : gcc (Alpine 5.3.0) 5.3.0
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/s390-cpumsf.o
LD /tmp/build/perf/util/scripting-engines/libperf-in.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-branch-options.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/dump-insn.o
util/s390-cpumsf.c: In function 'trailer_timestamp':
util/s390-cpumsf.c:222:2: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
return *((unsigned long long *) &te->timestamp[te->t]);
^
2 48.46 alpine:3.5 : gcc (Alpine 6.2.1) 6.2.1 20160822
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-branch-options.o
util/s390-cpumsf.c: In function 'trailer_timestamp':
util/s390-cpumsf.c:222:2: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
return *((unsigned long long *) &te->timestamp[te->t]);
^~~~~~
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/dump-insn.o
---------
I stopped at this point when this report/patch resurfaced in my mind, so
I came back and folded this fix into the cset introducing the problem
since it hasn't gone Ingo's way, so that we can keep this bisectable
when upstream.
Thanks guys!
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists