linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Add SPI driver support for GENI based QUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Aug 2018 09:47:44 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Dilip Kota <dkota@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>,
        Karthikeyan Ramasubramanian <kramasub@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Mahadevan, Girish" <girishm@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Add SPI driver support for GENI based QUP

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>> IMO the line marked "/* UNNEEDED */" below should be removed:
>
>>     ...
>>     spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;  /* UNNEEDED */
>
> This is a line in the device tree (which I agree shouldn't be there),
> not code in the SPI driver?

My whole point was that the line above shouldn't be there.  If you
agree to that then we're done.  Everything else was my suggestions of
ways the driver would deal with that line not being there.

-Doug