linux-kernel - [for-next][PATCH 27/34] tracing: irqsoff: Account for additional preempt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 11 Aug 2018 09:49:55 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 27/34] tracing: irqsoff: Account for additional preempt_disable

From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>

Recently we tried to make the preemptirqsoff tracer to use irqsoff
tracepoint probes. However this causes issues as reported by Masami:

[2.271078] Testing tracer preemptirqsoff: .. no entries found ..FAILED!
[2.381015] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at /home/mhiramat/ksrc/linux/kernel/
trace/trace.c:1512 run_tracer_selftest+0xf3/0x154

This is due to the tracepoint code increasing the preempt nesting count
by calling an additional preempt_disable before calling into the
preemptoff tracer which messes up the preempt_count() check in
tracer_hardirqs_off.

To fix this, make the irqsoff tracer probes balance the additional outer
preempt_disable with a preempt_enable_notrace.

The other way to fix this is to just use SRCU for all tracepoints.
However we can't do that because we can't use NMIs from RCU context.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180806034049.67949-1-joel@joelfernandes.org

Fixes: c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage")
Fixes: e6753f23d961 ("tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU")
Reported-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
index 770cd30cda40..ffbf1505d5bc 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
@@ -603,14 +603,40 @@ static void irqsoff_tracer_stop(struct trace_array *tr)
  */
 static void tracer_hardirqs_on(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1)
 {
+	/*
+	 * Tracepoint probes are expected to be called with preempt disabled,
+	 * We don't care about being called with preempt disabled but we need
+	 * to know in the future if that changes so we can remove the next
+	 * preempt_enable.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!preempt_count());
+
+	/* Tracepoint probes disable preemption atleast once, account for that */
+	preempt_enable_notrace();
+
 	if (!preempt_trace() && irq_trace())
 		stop_critical_timing(a0, a1);
+
+	preempt_disable_notrace();
 }
 
 static void tracer_hardirqs_off(void *none, unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1)
 {
+	/*
+	 * Tracepoint probes are expected to be called with preempt disabled,
+	 * We don't care about being called with preempt disabled but we need
+	 * to know in the future if that changes so we can remove the next
+	 * preempt_enable.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!preempt_count());
+
+	/* Tracepoint probes disable preemption atleast once, account for that */
+	preempt_enable_notrace();
+
 	if (!preempt_trace() && irq_trace())
 		start_critical_timing(a0, a1);
+
+	preempt_disable_notrace();
 }
 
 static int irqsoff_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr)
-- 
2.18.0