lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 21:50:58 +1000 From: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc> To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Convert filter.txt to RST On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:51:28AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:57 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote: > > > > The objective actually is to have SPDX tags in all files in the kernel. > > That includes documentation, even though people, as always, care less > > about the docs than they do the code. > > right, but let's do that as a separate patch set. > In the current set I'd focus on reviewing the actual doc changes. > In particular completely removing > Documentation/networking/filter.txt > feels wrong, since lots of websites point directly there. > Can we have at least few words there pointing to new location? Something like ... ------------ filter.txt BPF documentation can now be found in the following places: - Introduction to BPF (Linux Socket Filter) - Documentation/userspace-api/socket-filter.rst - Classic BPF (cBPF) - Documentation/userspace-api/cBPF.rst - Internal BPF (eBPF) - Documentation/userspace-api/eBPF.rst - SECCOMP BPF - Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst - BPF Design Q&A - Documentation/bpf/bpf_design_QA.rst - BPF Development Q&A - Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst ------------- Also this highlights that bpf/index.rst is not quite correct yet in this set. The Q&A files are indexed but not explicitly mentioned. My feeling is that bpf/index.rst should mirror the information above. thanks, Tobin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists