lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:45:51 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the rdma
 tree

Hi all,

On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 12:05:03 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   net/rds/ib_send.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   d34ac5cd3a73 ("RDMA, core and ULPs: Declare ib_post_send() and ib_post_recv() arguments const")
> 
> from the rdma tree and commit:
> 
>   87f70132b08e ("rds: remove redundant variable 'rds_ibdev'")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc net/rds/ib_send.c
> index 8ac80c1b051e,c8dd3125d398..000000000000
> --- a/net/rds/ib_send.c
> +++ b/net/rds/ib_send.c
> @@@ -758,8 -758,7 +758,7 @@@ int rds_ib_xmit_atomic(struct rds_conne
>   {
>   	struct rds_ib_connection *ic = conn->c_transport_data;
>   	struct rds_ib_send_work *send = NULL;
>  -	struct ib_send_wr *failed_wr;
>  +	const struct ib_send_wr *failed_wr;
> - 	struct rds_ib_device *rds_ibdev;
>   	u32 pos;
>   	u32 work_alloc;
>   	int ret;

This is now a conflict between Linux' tree and the rdma tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ