linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] livepatch: Atomic replace feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Aug 2018 16:53:10 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@...tuozzo.com>
Cc:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] livepatch: Atomic replace feature

On Fri 2018-08-17 13:17:27, Evgenii Shatokhin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 07.03.2018 11:20, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > The atomic replace allows to create cumulative patches. They
> > are useful when you maintain many livepatches and want to remove
> > one that is lower on the stack. In addition it is very useful when
> > more patches touch the same function and there are dependencies
> > between them.
> 
> Could you tell me what is the current status of this series? Looks like I
> lost track of it.
> 
> Is there anything else that should be done here before this series could be
> merged?

I have almost ready the rework suggested by Josh. I still need to
port the new tests and send.

Unfortunately I had to put it temporary on hold because of other
important tasks.

I am about to leave for vacation (one week off). I will try to
find some cycles, finish and send it once I am back.

Best Regards,
Petr