lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:56:23 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jchandra@...adcom.com" <jchandra@...adcom.com>,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: RE: how to fix acpi_pci_root_remap_iospace?

>> - Some targets don't have any support for I/O space on their PCI bus and just
>>    want to get things to compile by setting PCI_IOBASE to zero, this still opens
>>     up some of the same problems as above, but doesn't really help otherwise.

That sounds horrible. Why would you want to have a driver that can't possibly
work on your platform compile cleanly? That's just asking for trouble. Sombody
might load that driver, and ... all the outb/outw/outl calls just corrupt low memory.

> Hm, maybe it's just easier to revert the patch since we got rid of
> patches adding COMPILE_TEST to drivers which were using read/writesl()
> (it turned out ia64 and sparc were not the only archs to not implement
> readsx/writesx() variants, and fixing them is not that easy).

That sounds like a better course of action.

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ