lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:54:03 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     René Rebe <rene@...ctcode.com>
Cc:     Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
        Julian Andres Klode <julian.klode@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for ZSTD-compressed kernel

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 06:15:45PM +0200, René Rebe wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> is there any mainline future for this zstd support? Currently my most favourite compressor for this, and for what it’s worth zstd/initrd now even tested on #t2sde / hp/pa-risc, … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHplOJxnIHk

Can you remove some other compressor for the kernel image if you merge this?

The "favourite compressor" seems to roughly change every year, so if
we keep adding new ones things will get more and more convoluted.

Surely zstd is universally better than some existing compressor
the kernel already uses for itself for a particular sweet spot?
If it isn't it's likely not needed.

-Andi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ