linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 00/15] PCI: turn some _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Aug 2018 23:14:51 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] PCI: turn some __weak functions into callbacks

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:26:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Hi Bjorn and others,
> 
> Triggered by Christoph's patches, I had another go at converting
> all of the remaining pci host bridge implementations to be based
> on pci_alloc_host_bridge and a separate registration function.

I really like the idea behind this series.

> I'm adding a bit of duplication into the less maintained code
> here, but it makes everything more consistent, and gives an
> easy place to hook up callback functions etc.

I wonder if there is a way to avoid some of that by adding a few
more helpers, but even without the helpers that approach looks
ok to me.

Do you have a git tree somewhere to play around with the changes?