linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: prefer a higher rate clock as pixel-clock base

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:55:00 +0200
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: prefer a higher rate clock as pixel-clock base

If the divider used to get the pixel-clock is small, the granularity
of the frequencies possible for the pixel-clock is quite coarse. E.g.
requesting a pixel-clock of 65MHz with a sys_clk of 132MHz results
in the divider being set to 3 ending up with 44MHz.

By preferring the doubled sys_clk as base, the divider instead ends
up as 5 yielding a pixel-clock of 52.8Mhz, which is a definite
improvement.

While at it, clamp the divider so that it does not overflow in case
it gets big.

Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
index c38a479ada98..71c9cd90d2ae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
@@ -101,18 +101,22 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_crtc_mode_set_nofb(struct drm_crtc *c)
 		     (adj->crtc_hdisplay - 1) |
 		     ((adj->crtc_vdisplay - 1) << 16));
 
-	cfg = 0;
+	cfg = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
 
-	prate = clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
+	prate = 2 * clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
 	mode_rate = adj->crtc_clock * 1000;
-	if ((prate / 2) < mode_rate) {
-		prate *= 2;
-		cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
-	}
 
 	div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
 	if (div < 2)
 		div = 2;
+	else if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK) {
+		/* the divider ended up too big, try a lower base rate */
+		cfg &= ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
+		prate /= 2;
+		div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
+		if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK)
+			div = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK;
+	}
 
 	cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div);
 
-- 
2.11.0