lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:38:10 -0700
From:   vnkgutta@...eaurora.org
To:     Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
Cc:     robh@...nel.org, mchehab@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, tsoni@...eaurora.org,
        ckadabi@...eaurora.org, rishabhb@...eaurora.org, bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] drivers: edac: Add EDAC driver support for QCOM
 SoCs

On 2018-08-23 16:07, Evan Green wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:04 PM Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org> 
> wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 5:08 PM Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta
>> <vnkgutta@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Channagoud Kadabi <ckadabi@...eaurora.org>
> 
> Also checkpatch.pl complains a bit about this patch:
> 
>             WARNING: Non-standard signature: Co-developed-by:
>             #14:
>             Co-developed-by: Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta
> <vnkgutta@...eaurora.org>

This needs to be there as the original author is Channagoud Kadabi
and I'm the one who is modifying and upstreaming this driver.
It was suggested to have this kind of signature from the earlier 
patchset comments.

Can we do anything about this?

> 
>             WARNING: please write a paragraph that describes the
> config symbol fully
>             #63: FILE: drivers/edac/Kconfig:460:
>             +config EDAC_QCOM

This is also, I will check if I can get rid of this by writing more in 
the description.
I don't really understand why do we need a paragraph here.

> 
>             WARNING: DT compatible string "qcom,llcc-edac" appears
> un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
>             #536: FILE: drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c:430:
>             + { .compatible = "qcom,llcc-edac" },

This file is not added in the dt-bindings as there are no properties 
(like reg-names or interrupts) for this driver
and anyway initialized from llcc driver.

Do we still need to have the Documentation in place?

> 
>             total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 533 lines checked
> 
> -Evan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ