lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:22:26 +0200
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, vicencb@...il.com, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
        ezequiel@...labora.com, enric.balletbo@...labora.com,
        pbrobinson@...il.com, tom@...rs.com, dev@...rs.com,
        stephen@...rs.com, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add binding for Rock960 board

Am Montag, 10. September 2018, 17:13:54 CEST schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> Add devicetree binding for Rock960 board from Vamrs Limited.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
> index acfd3c773dd0..aaad9e2ff9a3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
> @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Rockchip platforms device tree bindings
>      Required root node properties:
>        - compatible = "vamrs,ficus", "rockchip,rk3399";
>  
> +- 96boards RK3399 Rock960 (ROCK960 Consumer Edition)
> +    Required root node properties:
> +      - compatible = "vamrs,rk3399-rock960", "rockchip,rk3399";

hmm, are there more boards labeled rock960 from Vamrs?
Because I'm trying to determine what makes "vamrs,rock960" unsuitable.


Heiko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ