linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/7] Memory-model changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:29:21 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:     Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        parri.andrea@...il.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com, npiggin@...il.com,
        dhowells@...hat.com, Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>, akiyks@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC memory-model 0/7] Memory-model changes

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 01:19:37PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > 	bf36a3124d04 doc: Replace smp_cond_acquire() with smp_cond_load_acquire()
> > 
> > 		Small change, needs an ack.  Looks to me like is is
> > 		just aligning the documentation with the code, so
> > 		should not be controversial (famous last words).
> > 
> > 		Please take a look and consider giving feedback
> > 		and/or a review/ack.
> 
> What branch is this commit in?  It doesn't seem to be in the lkmm 
> branch.

It was in the dev branch, and was the child of the lkmm branch.

> In any case, the change is trivial and obviously correct.
> 
> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>

Thank you, applied!

And now it is in the lkmm branch.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul