linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] making uapi/linux/elfcore.h useful again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Sep 2018 21:55:21 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        GNU C Library <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] making uapi/linux/elfcore.h useful again

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:45 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > - Move required data from the private x86 asm/elf.h file into
> >   a new uapi/asm/elf.h. Some other architectures already do that,
> >   but most of them do not. Before applying the patch, we have
> >   to do this for all architectures
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>

Thanks,

> I suspect this wants to go through -mm, or do you want to carry it?

-mm is probably best. For now, I just want to see if there are any
concerns about this, and then I'd have to do the full version that
changes all architectures.

     Arnd