lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:17:20 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mike.travis@....com, sivanich@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: Add an option to change the padding used
 for the physical memory mapping


* Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com> wrote:

> Ping...
> I would appreciate if someone could review it because this patch
> fixes the real memory hotplug issue...

Yeah, so I generally try to resist random new boot options that
work around real bugs, so please convince me that this patch
is the best option:

> 
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:11:40AM -0400, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
> > From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
> > 
> > If each node of physical memory layout has huge space for hotplug,
> > the padding used for the physical memory mapping section is not enough.
> > For exapmle of the layout:
> >   SRAT: Node 6 PXM 4 [mem 0x100000000000-0x13ffffffffff] hotplug
> >   SRAT: Node 7 PXM 5 [mem 0x140000000000-0x17ffffffffff] hotplug
> >   SRAT: Node 2 PXM 6 [mem 0x180000000000-0x1bffffffffff] hotplug
> >   SRAT: Node 3 PXM 7 [mem 0x1c0000000000-0x1fffffffffff] hotplug
> > 
> > We can increase the padding by CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING,
> > however, the needed padding size depends on the system environment.
> > The kernel option is better than changing the config.
> > 
> > Change log from v2:
> >  - Simplify the description. As Baoquan said, this is simillar SGI UV issue,
> >    but a little different. Remove SGI UV description.

Could you please explain it a bit better where the higher padding requirement comes from?

'system environment' is very opaque.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ