linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] UBIFS fixes for 4.19-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Sep 2018 16:08:10 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] UBIFS fixes for 4.19-rc4

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 04:01:33PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Freitag, 21. September 2018, 15:53:42 CEST schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:33:15AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > Greg,
> > > 
> > > The following changes since commit ae596de1a0c8c2c924dc99d23c026259372ab234:
> > > 
> > >   Compiler Attributes: naked can be shared (2018-09-20 15:23:58 +0200)
> > 
> > Wow, bold move, new patches with less than 24 hours in your tree.  That
> > means linux-next didn't see them :(
> > 
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > 
> > >   git://git.infradead.org/linux-ubifs.git tags/upstream-4.19-rc4
> > 
> > Now pulled, but really, don't you think that they should at least go
> > through 0-day first?  Maybe no one runs ubifs on mainline kernels...
> 
> Huh? I checked this morning next-20180921 and saw all patches.

Ah, ok, must have snuck in, I assumed that less than 24 hours was pretty
fast...