linux-kernel - Re: Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 23 Sep 2018 13:44:55 -0500
From:   "\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward@...il.com>
To:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        "\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward@...il.com>,
        "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Edward Cree <ec429@...tab.net>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.

> For example....
>
>> >* Showing empathy towards other community members
>>
>> Your pussy hurts?  Maybe you should have just accepted that your a boy!
>>
>> I think Linus is perfectly fine in conduct.   I mean, this bullshit
>> pressure comes from corporations and other wierd places (<subtext>all
>> seeing eye</subtext>) that want to "help".
>
> There are people commenting from all sides that are wanting to "help".
> But I hope that it is obvious that the above text is *not* *helpful*.
> Mark, please stop.

General Tso,

The problem with your criticism is that it assumes that all input is
legitimate while you advocate eliminating (or downgrading) some of it.

Make up your mind:  do you want all-inclusiveness or selective-inclusiveness?

Mark