linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] futex: Set USER_DS for the futex_detect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:12:10 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Set USER_DS for the futex_detect_cmpxchg() test

Hi Thomas,

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 8:21 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > I have a couple questions here:
> >
> >  - Is this actually okay on all architectures?  That is, are there
> >    cases where we'll screw up if we fail a USER_DS access this early?
> >    s390 stands out as the obvious special case (where USER_DS is not
> >    than just a subset of KERNEL_DS), but s390 opts out.
> >
> >  - Why doesn't x86 set HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG?  Or do we still support
> >    some 32-bit configurations that don't have cmpxchg and don't know
> >    about it at compile time?
>
> I'm not entirely sure. Have to dig into the details. I assume S390 just can
> set it though.

Not sure. My "[PATCH] futex: Switch to USER_DS for futex test"
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg28846.html), which is
basically the same
as this patch, broke s390, so it was never merged.

See "[BUG -next] "futex: switch to USER_DS for futex test" breaks s390"
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-next/msg27902.html)

Heiko said:
| Martin and I discussed this today and we will change the s390 code so that
| it will also survive very early USER_DS accesses (without valid current->mm)
| since we also discovered a couple of other oddities in our code.

I don't know if that has happened, and whether it would work on s390 now.

> >  kernel/futex.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> > index 11fc3bb456d6..16bd3e72602a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/futex.c
> > +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> > @@ -3593,6 +3593,7 @@ static void __init futex_detect_cmpxchg(void)
> >  {
> >  #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG
> >       u32 curval;
> > +     mm_segment_t old_seg;
> >
> >       /*
> >        * This will fail and we want it. Some arch implementations do
> > @@ -3604,8 +3605,11 @@ static void __init futex_detect_cmpxchg(void)
> >        * implementation, the non-functional ones will return
> >        * -ENOSYS.
> >        */
> > +     old_seg = get_fs();
> > +     set_fs(USER_DS);
> >       if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, NULL, 0, 0) == -EFAULT)
> >               futex_cmpxchg_enabled = 1;
> > +     set_fs(old_seg);
> >  #endif
> >  }

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds