linux-kernel - Re: [RFCv2 00/48] perf tools: Add threads to record command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:14:30 +0900
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 00/48] perf tools: Add threads to record command

Hi,

Sorry for late..

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:32:11PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> On 24.09.2018 17:29, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 04:09:09PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> >> Command:
> >>
> >> /usr/bin/time ./perf.thr record --threads=T \
> >> 	-N -B -T -R --call-graph dwarf,1024 --user-regs=ip,bp,sp \
> >> 	-e cpu/period=P,event=0x3c/Duk,\
> >> 	   cpu/period=P,umask=0x3/Duk,\
> >> 	   cpu/period=P,event=0xc0/Duk,\
> >> 	   cpu/period=0xaae61,event=0xc2,umask=0x10/uk,\
> >> 	   cpu/period=0x11171,event=0xc2,umask=0x20/uk,\
> >> 	   cpu/period=0x11171,event=0xc2,umask=0x40/uk \
> >> 	--clockid=monotonic_raw -- ./matrix.gcc
> >>
> >> Workload: matrix multiplication in 128 threads
> >>
> >> T : 272
> >> 	P (period, ms)       : 0.35 
> >> 	runtime overhead (%) : 13x ~ 87.73 / 6.81
> >> 	data loss (%)        : 0
> >> 	LOST events          : 36
> >> 	SAMPLE events        : 8048542
> >>    perf.data size (GiB) : 10
> > 
> > any idea why does it have some much more samples?
> 
> Presumably, this is because period is 350us and this is the smallest 
> one that perf.thr manages to capture data without data loss (=0) when T=272.
> However, during collection, I get message that max sampling frequency 
> is lowered to 3KHz.

And it took much longer than AIO:  87.73 vs 22.34  (N=272)

Thanks,
Namhyung